![]() ![]() It's kind of a messed up deal in that it is legal to carry a firearm in a vehicle in Texas without a CHL and no requirement to inform what so ever unless specifically asked about weapons because 411.205 only applies to chl holders. 411.187 has been amended effective 9/1/09 to remove any penalty (sec 2a) for breaking 411.205 (above). If a license holder is carrying a handgun on or about the license holder's person when a magistrate or a peace officer demands that the license holder display identification, the license holder shall display both the license holder's driver's license or identification certificate issued by the department and the license holder's handgun license. However, there have been accounts of officers sending a report to DPS for failure to notify, which may result in a suspension of the CHL Technically correct however there is no penalty in Texas for not providing your CHL ![]() Therefore, Officer Bubba having knowledge of the requirements to obtain the permit did not act as a reasonable person with such knowledge would be expected to." That's the way a reasonable person would react who understands what people go through to obtain a carry permit. Then Officer Bubba used the information that he just obtained which was verification that I am a completely law abiding citizen, more 'upstanding' if you will than the average citizen in that I went to the extra lengths and expense to prove to the state that I am.he used that information as a basis to take more hostile actions and force against me than he would had I not had documented proof that I was a law abiding citizen with no record? To the reasonable person, the information that Officer Bubba received from the state should have had a calming affect, alleviating fears of a violent attack rather than causing them more fear. "Judge.Officer Bubba here found out information from state XYZ that I have been fingerprinted, I have had a background check done, and I have nothing criminal in my record that makes it illegal for me to carry a firearm. I'm keeping my mouth shut about my permit and my gun if I am carrying it and if the cop wants to unlawfully detain me because he/she finds out from the state that I have a carry, this is the way I will explain it to the judge when I sue them for unlawful detainment. This is one very specific instance where criminals have more rights than law abiding citizens do.Īnd when we cater to thugs like that we encourage their behavior to continue and get worse. Duty to inform laws cannot be imposed upon those who are illegally carrying a firearm because such a law would violate the criminals' 5th Amendment right to not be forced or coerced into self incrimination. duty to inform laws can only be imposed upon persons who are legally carrying a firearm. In other states, you must inform according to that state's law, but none of them require informing the officer if you are not actually carrying a gun. The officer requests ID or a driver's license. The officer identifies themselves as a law enforcement officer, ANDģ. Notice the three conditions that must ALL be met in order to be required to inform the officer:ġ. (2) requests identification or a driver's license from a permit holder. (1) identifies himself as a law enforcement officer and When carrying a concealable weapon pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 31, Title 23, a permit holder must inform a law enforcement officer of the fact that he is a permit holder and present the permit identification card when an officer: (K) A permit holder must have his permit identification card in his possession whenever he carries a concealable weapon. There is no state that requires you to even carry your permit when you are not also carrying your gun, and there is no state that requires you to inform the officer when you are not carrying a gun.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |